On Conditioning

Behavioral psychology describes how people interact with different stimuli. The fathers of this field are Ivan Pavlov and B.F. Skinner. They described classical conditioning and operant conditioning, respectively, of which examples are seen in human behavior every day.

Pavlov's Dog Pavlovian conditioning, or classical conditioning, is when two stimuli are presented simultaneously, one that elicits a response naturally and one that is conditioned to elicit that response by being presented at the same time as the unconditioned stimulus. The picture to the left illustrates this plainly with Pavlov’s famous dog experiment.

The more common and widely witnessed form of conditioning is B.F. Skinner’s operant conditioning, which is when a certain behavior is rewarded or punished. A reward can come in the form of positive reinforcement or negative reinforcement. Both positive and reinforce a behavior, encouraging it to be repeated. But, one encourages it by providing a positive stimulus and the other by a removal of a negative stimulus.

Pavlov's Dog The famous experiment that B.F. Skinner is known for is his box. A rat is placed in a box where there is a lever and a food chute. The rat stays in the box and runs around, accidentally hitting the lever, being rewarded with food. Eventually, the rat learns that hitting the lever rewards him with food, and so he has been conditioned to hit the lever when he wants food. Switching the wiring to shock the rat, through the grid, every time he touches the lever will quickly result in the termination of the conditioning. This is a prime example of punishment, which discourages the recurrence of a behavior.

Now, recently I wrote an article on Education which referenced conditioning. The students are conditioned to take the tests, merely for the reward of the A, which results in parent approval, college acceptances, etc. Their goal is the A, nothing more just like the rat simply wants the food. Now lets assume that the rat gets a workout every time it pushes the lever. If, he pushes the lever, and the food pellet doesn’t drop, it will eventually become unmotivated and stop pushing it, despite the workout. This is the same idea with the students taking the test. What they don’t know is that if they work out, they can eventually escape the box and won’t have to hit the lever for food.

4 Responses to “On Conditioning”

  1. lawl Says:

    Not only is a human’s mind more complex than either a rat’s or dog’s, but there is no box out of which a student can/can’t escape.

    Think outside the box, junior blogger/ wanna-be scientist, extraordinaire.

  2. George Says:

    I’m sorry you couldn’t understand the analogy. To understand my point, you have to let go of your own predispositions and open your mind completely to my comments, and then judge the validity of it. But thanks anyway!

    What I was trying to convey with that student/rat example was an analogy. The student corresponds to the rat, the food pellet with the grade, and the box with self-actualization. If the student stops chasing the food pellet, he will do the work in class, i.e. push the lever, for the good of doing it which will result in him escaping the box, becoming self actualized. This is a much greater reward than the simple A or the food pellet for the moment.

  3. lawl Says:

    Bad analogy. ✔
    Inability to detect sarcasm. ✔
    Idiotic/pointless information. ✔
    Pompous-know-it-all. ✔

    Looks like your all set to run your own blog.
    Good luck.

    …and hopefully, good riddance(soon enough)

  4. George Says:

    I already thanked you for your advice and tried to clarify it. Now you seem to be just looking for an argument. I’d appreciate if you had the balls to put your name and proper contact information. Because you should always remember.

Leave a Reply